4.6 Article

Operationalization of Community-Based Participatory Research Principles: Assessment of the National Cancer Institute's Community Network Programs

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 102, 期 6, 页码 1195-1203

出版社

AMER PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOC INC
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300304

关键词

-

资金

  1. 'Imi Hale Native Hawaiian Cancer Network [U01CA114630]
  2. Asian American Network for Cancer Awareness, Research and Training [U01CA114630]
  3. Weaving an Islander Network for Cancer Awareness, Research and Training [U01 CA114591]
  4. University of Oklahoma [U01 CA 114626]
  5. National Black Leadership Initiative on Cancer III [U01CA114652]
  6. Southwest American Indian Collaborative Network [U01 CA114696]
  7. Meharry Medical College-Community Health Centers Network [U01CA114641]
  8. ATECAR-Asian Community Cancer Network [U01 CA114582]
  9. South Carolina Cancer Disparities Community Network [U01 CA114601]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives. We examined how National Cancer Institute funded Community Network Programs (CNPs) operationalized principles of community-based participatory research (CBPR). Methods. We reviewed the literature and extant CBPR measurement tools. On the basis of that review, we developed a 27-item questionnaire for CNPs to self-assess their operationalization of 9 CBPR principles. Our team comprised representatives of 9 of the National Cancer Institute's 25 CNPs. Results. Of the 25 CNPs, 22 (88%) completed the questionnaire. Most scored well on CBPR principles of recognizing community as a unit of identity, building on community strengths, facilitating colearning, embracing iterative processes in developing community capacity, and achieving a balance between data generation and intervention. CNPs varied in the extent to which they employed CBPR principles of addressing determinants of health, sharing power among partners, engaging the community in research dissemination, and striving for sustainability. Conclusions. Although the development of assessment tools in this field is in its infancy, our findings suggest that fidelity to CBPR processes can be assessed in a variety of settings. (Am J Public Health. 2012;102:1195-1203. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300304)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据