期刊
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 101, 期 7, 页码 1172-1179出版社
AMER PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOC INC
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.300043
关键词
-
The 2010 US Supreme Court Citizens United v Federal Election Commission 130 US 876 (2010) case concerned the plans of a nonprofit organization to distribute a film about presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. The Court ruled that prohibiting corporate independent expenditures for advocacy advertising during election campaigns unconstitutionally inhibits free speech. Corporations can now make unlimited contributions to election advocacy advertising directly from the corporate treasury. Candidates who favor public health positions may be subjected to corporate opposition advertising. Citizen groups and legislators have proposed remedies to ameliorate the effects of the Court's ruling. The public health field needs to apply its expertise, in collaboration with others, to work to reduce the disproportionate influence of corporate political speech on health policy and democracy. (Am J Public Health. 2011;101:1172-1179. doi:10. 2105/AJPH.2010.300043)
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据