4.6 Article

Exploring Scenarios to Dramatically Reduce Smoking Prevalence: A Simulation Model of the Three-Part Cessation Process

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 100, 期 7, 页码 1253-1259

出版社

AMER PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOC INC
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.166785

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Tobacco Cessation Collaborative's Consumer Demand Roundtable
  2. National Institutes of Health, Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research (OBSSR) [HHSN 276200700294P]
  3. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF)
  4. Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) of the Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute [UO1-CA97450-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives. We used a simulation model to analyze whether the Healthy People 2010 goal of reducing smoking prevalence from the current 19.8% rate to 12% by 2010 could be accomplished by increasing quit attempts, increasing the use of treatments, or increasing the effectiveness of treatment. Methods. We expanded on previous versions of the tobacco control simulation model SimSmoke to assess the effects of an increase in quit attempts, treatment use, and treatment effectiveness to reduce smoking prevalence. In the model, we considered increases in each of these parameters individually and in combination. Results. Individually, 100% increases in quit attempts, treatment use, and treatment effectiveness reduced the projected 2020 prevalence to 13.9%, 16.7%, and 15.9%, respectively. With a combined 100% increase in all components, the goal of a 12% adult smoking prevalence could be reached by 2012. Conclusions. If we are to come close to reaching Healthy People 2010 goals in the foreseeable future, we must not only induce quit attempts but also increase treatment use and effectiveness. Simulation models provide a useful tool for evaluating the potential to reach public health targets. (Am J Public Health. 2010; 100:1253-1259. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2009.166785)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据