4.6 Article

Lessons Learned From Evaluations of California's Statewide School Nutrition Standards

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 100, 期 11, 页码 2137-2145

出版社

AMER PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOC INC
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.193490

关键词

-

资金

  1. California Endowment through Samuels and Associates [20042960, 20042808]
  2. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation [57926]
  3. US Department of Agriculture through California Department of Education Nutrition Services Division [CN077297]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives. We assessed the impact of legislation that established nutrition standards for foods and beverages that, compete with reimbursable school meals in California. Methods. We used documentation of available foods and beverages, sales accounts, and surveys of and interviews with students and food service workers to conduct 3 studies measuring pre- and postlegislation food and beverage availability, sales, and student consumption at 99 schools. Results. Availability of nutrition standard-compliant foods and beverages increased. Availability of noncompliant items decreased, with the biggest reductions in sodas and other sweetened beverages, regular chips, and candy. At-school consumption of some noncompliant foods dropped; at-home consumption of selected noncompliant foods did not increase. Food and beverage sales decreased at most venues, and food service a la carte revenue losses were usually offset by increased meal program participation. Increased food service expenditures outpaced revenue increases: Conclusions. Regulation of competitive foods improved school food environments and student nutritional intake. improvements were modest, partly because many compliant items are fat- and sugar-modified products of low nutritional value. Additional policies and actions are needed to achieve more substantive improvements in school nutrition environments and student nutrition and health. (Am J Public Health. 2010;100:2137-2145. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2010.193490)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据