4.6 Article

Mecamylamine suppresses basal and nicotine-stimulated choroidal neovascularization

期刊

INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE
卷 49, 期 4, 页码 1705-1711

出版社

ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.07-0089

关键词

-

资金

  1. NEI NIH HHS [R01 EY012609, R01 EY012609-09] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors ( nAChR) are best known for their role in neurotransmission, but they have recently been demonstrated on vascular endothelial cells. Acetylcholine is their endogenous ligand, but they are also stimulated by nicotine. By stimulating nAChR, nicotine promotes tumor angiogenesis as well as atherosclerotic plaque neovascularization. In this study, the authors investigated the role of nAChR in the pathogenesis of choroidal neovascularization (CNV). METHODS. The effect of the nonselective nAChR antagonist mecamylamine was tested on human retinal and choroidal endothelial cells in vitro and in a murine model of CNV. RESULTS. Several nAChR isoforms were identified in retinal and choroidal microvascular endothelial cells, and the ability of these cells to form tubules when grown in growth factor reduced basement membrane matrix and supplemented with VEGF was suppressed by the nAChR antagonist mecamylamine. Supplementation of the drinking water of mice with nicotine increased the size of CNV lesions at Bruch membrane rupture sites, an effect that was blocked by subcutaneous administration of mecamylamine ( 50 mg/kg/d) by an osmotic pump. In the absence of nicotine, CNV formation was suppressed by the infusion of 50 mg/kg/d mecamylamine or by topical application 0.1 or 1% mecamylamine to the cornea. CONCLUSIONS. These data suggest that endogenous activation of nAChR promotes CNV and that activation of nAChR by nicotine may contribute to the increased incidence of CNV seen in smokers with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Topically administered mecamylamine could provide an appealing new treatment approach for CNV.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据