4.7 Article

Lattice Boltzmann simulations for surface wettability effects in saturated pool boiling heat transfer

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.02.008

关键词

Pool boiling; Lattice Boltzmann method; Wettability; Bubble dynamics; Boiling curve

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51036005, 51420105009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Effects of wettability on saturated pool boiling heat transfer from a smooth superheated substrate, with a finite thickness at constant wall temperatures at the bottom, are investigated based on a recently developed liquid-vapor phase-change lattice Boltzmann method. For a hydrophilic surface, it is shown that bubble departure diameter and bubble departure frequency increase with the increase of contact angle and superheat, and the whole bubble departs from the surface with a waiting period in the ebullition cycle. A microlayer of liquid exists between the bubble and the heated hydrophilic surface and this region exhibits a high local heat flux during bubble growth period. On the other hand, a residual bubble will be left on the surface when bubble departs from a hydrophobic surface and hence no waiting period exists. No microlayer exists on the heated hydrophobic surface, and the three-phase contact line region has the highest local heat flux and lowest local temperature. Time histories of the wall temperature on the top of a hydrophilic substrate and a hydrophobic substrate as well as the associated heat flux are studied in details during the nucleate boiling process. Effects of wettability, superheat and heater size on number of nucleation sites in saturated pool boiling are investigated. Saturated boiling curves (from onset of nucleate boiling to critical heat flux, to transition boiling to stable film boiling) for hydrophilic and hydrophobic heating surfaces are obtained by numerical simulation for the first time. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据