4.6 Article

A Genome Scan for Loci Shared by Autism Spectrum Disorder and Language Impairment

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
卷 171, 期 1, 页码 72-81

出版社

AMER PSYCHIATRIC PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12081103

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIMH [R01 MH-070366, RC1 MH-088288]
  2. NIMH Center for Collaborative Genomic Studies on Mental Disorders
  3. Ohio Supercomputer Center [PCCR0001-2]
  4. [U24 MH-068457]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The authors conducted a genetic linkage study of families that have both autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and language-impaired probands to find common communication impairment loci. The hypothesis was that these families have a high genetic loading for impairments in language ability, thus influencing the language and communication deficits of the family members with ASD. Comprehensive behavioral phenotyping of the families also enabled linkage analysis of quantitative measures, including normal, subclinical, and disordered variation in all family members for the three general autism symptom domains: social, communication, and compulsive behaviors. Method: The primary linkage analysis coded persons with either ASD or specific language impairment as affected. The secondary linkage analysis consisted of quantitative metrics of autism-associated behaviors capturing normal to clinically severe variation, measured in all family members. Results: Linkage to language phenotypes was established at two novel chromosomal loci, 15q23-26 and 16p12. The secondary analysis of normal and disordered quantitative variation in social and compulsive, behaviors established linkage to two loci for social behaviors (at 14q and 15q) and one locus for repetitive behaviors (at 13q). Conclusion: These data indicate shared etiology of ASD and specific language impairment at two novel loci. Additionally, non-language phenotypes based on social aloofness and rigid personality traits showed compelling evidence for linkage in this study group. Further genetic mapping is warranted at these loci.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据