4.6 Article

Antidepressant Efficacy of Ketamine in Treatment-Resistant Major Depression: A Two-Site Randomized Controlled Trial

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
卷 170, 期 10, 页码 1134-1142

出版社

AMER PSYCHIATRIC PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13030392

关键词

-

资金

  1. Evotec
  2. Janssen Pharmaceuticals
  3. Avanir
  4. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai from AstraZeneca
  5. Brainsway
  6. Euthymics
  7. Neosync
  8. Roche
  9. CNS Response
  10. Otsuka
  11. Servier
  12. Sunovion
  13. AstraZeneca
  14. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  15. Johnson Johnson
  16. Roche Pharmaceuticals
  17. NIH
  18. NIH/NIMH
  19. NARSAD
  20. USAMRAA
  21. Allergan
  22. Cephalon
  23. Corcept
  24. Naurex
  25. Noven
  26. Takeda
  27. NIMH [RO1 MH-081870, 1K23 MH-094707]
  28. NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [UL1 TR000067]
  29. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
  30. NARSAD Independent Investigator Award
  31. Brown Foundation, Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Ketamine, a glutamate N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, has shown rapid antidepressant effects, but small study groups and inadequate control conditions in prior studies have precluded a definitive conclusion. The authors evaluated the rapid antidepressant efficacy of ketamine in a large group of patients with treatment-resistant major depression. Method: This was a two-site, parallel-arm, randomized controlled trial of a single infusion of ketamine compared to an active placebo control condition, the anesthetic midazolam. Patients with treatment-resistant major depression experiencing a major depressive episode were randomly assigned under double-blind conditions to receive a single intravenous infusion of ketamine or midazolam in a 2:1 ratio (N=73). The primary outcome was change in depression severity 24 hours after drug administration, as assessed by the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Results: The ketamine group had greater improvement in the MADRS score than the midazolam group 24 hours after treatment. After adjustment for baseline scores and site, the MADRS score was lower in the ketamine group than in the midazolam group by 7.95 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.20 to 12.71). The likelihood of response at 24 hours was greater with ketamine than with midazolam (odds ratio, 2.18; 95% Cl, 1.21 to 4.14), with response rates of 64% and 28%, respectively. Conclusions: Ketamine demonstrated rapid antidepressant effects in an optimized study design, further supporting NMDA receptor modulation as a novel mechanism for accelerated improvement in severe and chronic forms of depression. More information on response durability and safety is required before implementation in clinical practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据