4.4 Article

Vitamin D receptor levels and binding are reduced in aged rat intestinal subcellular fractions

期刊

BIOGERONTOLOGY
卷 9, 期 2, 页码 109-118

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10522-007-9118-2

关键词

enterocytes; 1 alpha,25(OH)(2)D-3; vitamin D receptor; subcellular fractions; ageing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The hormonal form of vitamin D, 1 alpha,25(OH)(2)-vitaminD(3) [1 alpha,25(OH)(2)D-3], stimulates signal transduction pathways in intestinal cells. To gain insight into the relative importance of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) in the rapid hormone responses, the amounts and localization of the VDR were evaluated in young (3 months) and aged (24 months) rat intestinal cells. Immune-fluorescence and Western blot studies showed that VDR levels are diminished in aged enterocytes. Confocal microscopy assays revealed that the VDR and other immune-reactive proteins have mitochondrial, membrane, cytosol and perinuclear localization. Western blot analysis using specific antibodies detected the 60 and 50 kDa bands expected for the VDR in the cytosol and microsomes and, to a lesser extent, in the nucleus and mitochondria. Low molecular weight immune-reactive proteins were also detected in young enterocytes subcellular fractions. Since changes in hormone receptor levels appear to constitute a common manifestation of the ageing process, we also analyzed 1 alpha,25(OH)(2)D-3 binding properties and VDR levels in subcellular fractions from young and aged rats. In competition binding assays, employing [H-3]-1 alpha,25(OH)(2)D-3 and 1 alpha,25(OH)(2)D-3, we have detected specific binding in all subcellular fractions, with maximum binding in mitochondrial and nuclear fractions. Both, VDR protein levels and 1 alpha,25(OH)(2)D-3 binding, were diminished with ageing. Age-related declines in VDR may have important consequences for correct receptor/effector coupling in the duodenal tissues and may explain age-related declines in the hormonal regulation of signal transduction pathways that we previously reported.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据