4.7 Article

Genetic variation in proteins of the cryopyrin inflammasome influences susceptibility and severity of rheumatoid arthritis (The Swedish TIRA project)

期刊

RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 47, 期 4, 页码 415-417

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kem372

关键词

disease course; genetics; inflammasome; rheumatoid arthritis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives. The genetic background to RA is incompletely understood. As new cytokine-targeted therapies emerge, early predictors of disease severity are becoming increasingly important. The inflammasomes are essential regulators of cytokine production. We investigated whether two polymorphisms in the genes encoding cryopyrin (CIAS1) and TUCAN (CARD8) influence susceptibility and disease course in RA. Methods. Genotype frequencies were assessed in 174 Swedish patients with early RA and 360 population-based controls without rheumatic disease. Genotypes were categorized according to the presence (+) or absence (-) of two wild-type alleles and compared between patients and controls. In the RA patients, antibodies towards cyclic citrullinated peptides (anti-CCP) and the 'shared epitope' (SE) were assessed, and medication and measures of disease activity were monitored regularly during 3 yrs. Results. The combination of CIAS1/TUCAN -/-, as compared with CIAS1/TUCAN +/+, was significantly more common among patients than in controls [odds ratio (OR) 2.2, 95% CI 1.03-4.6]. This association was strengthened when patients were divided into anti-CCP+ [OR 2.8 (1.1-6.7)] or presence of >= 1 SE copy [OR 2.8 (1.3-6.2)]. At most time-points during the 3-yr follow-up, patients with CIAS1/TUCAN -/- showed significantly higher disease activity. Furthermore, CIAS1/TUCAN -/- patients proved to be much morel likely to receive TNF-blocking therapy [relative risk 20 (2.6-149)]. Conclusions. Compound polymorphisms in CIAS1 and TUCAN associate with RA susceptibility and severity. The cryopyrin inflammasome needs further attention regarding a possible aetiopathogenetic connection with RA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据