4.3 Article

Are Apes Inequity Averse? New Data on the Token-Exchange Paradigm

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY
卷 71, 期 2, 页码 175-181

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajp.20639

关键词

inequity aversion; social cognition; prosocial behavior; other regarding preferences; fairness

类别

资金

  1. American Society of Primatologists (ASP)
  2. Ethical Treatment of Non-Human Primates
  3. Psychology of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
  4. Leipzig Zoo. Furthermore

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies have produced mixed evidence about inequity aversion in nonhuman primates. Brosnan et al. [Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 272:253-258, 2005] found inequity aversion in chimpanzees and argued that effort is crucial, if subjects are to evaluate how they are rewarded in comparison to a competitor for an identical performance. In this study we investigated inequity aversion with chimpanzees, bonobos and orangutans, using the method of Brosnan et al. [Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 272:253-258, 2005] after introducing some methodological improvements. Subjects always received a less-preferred food in exchange for a token, whereas the competitor received either the same type of food for their token (equity) or a more favored food for it (inequity). Apes did not refuse more of the less-preferred food when a competitor had received the more favored food. Thus, with an improved methodology we failed to reproduce the findings of Brosnan et al. [Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 272:253-258, 2005] that apes show inequity aversion. Am. J. Primatol. 71:175-181, 2009. (C) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据