4.3 Article

Methods for Calculating Activity Budgets Compared: A Case Study Using Orangutans

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY
卷 71, 期 4, 页码 353-358

出版社

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/ajp.20655

关键词

computational methods; sample size; activity budget; focal-animal follows; orangutan

类别

资金

  1. Wingate Foundation
  2. Conservation International Primate Action Fund
  3. Primate Conservation Inc
  4. Cambridge Philosophical Society
  5. University of Cambridge
  6. L.S.B. Leakey Foundation
  7. A.H. Schultz Foundation
  8. National Science Foundation [0643122]
  9. Denver Zoological Society
  10. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci
  11. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [0643122] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The results of comparisons of behavioral data between individuals, age-sex classes, seasons, sites and possibly even species may depend on sample size and the computational method used. To establish whether these are valid concerns, we compared results for percentage time spent feeding on major food types (fruit, leaves, flowers, invertebrates, bark, pith and other) for two orangutan populations in Sabangau (24 months) and Tuanan (29 months), Indonesian Borneo. Both the minimum follow limit included in analyses and the computational method used produced small, but statistically significant, differences in the results obtained, and the differences were more common for food types eaten less frequently. In addition, using different computational methods produced more significant differences than did including different minimum follow lengths in analyses. The computational method used also influenced the results of tests for differences in diet composition between age-sex classes. Thus, the method used can influence the results obtained and, hence, it is important to state explicitly the minimum follow limit included and computational method used to compile averages, and to ensure standardization in methods when comparing data between age-sex classes, time periods, field sites or species. Am. J. Primatol. 71:353-358, 2009. (C) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据