4.6 Article

Inflammatory markers and the progression of IgA glomerulonephritis

期刊

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
卷 23, 期 4, 页码 1285-1290

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfm782

关键词

albumin; hs-CRP; IgA glomerulonephritis; interleukin-6; white blood cell count

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. IgA glomerulonephritis (IgAGN) composes a variable prognosis with 15-40% of the patients eventually progressing to end-stage renal failure. Known risk factors for progressive course of IgAGN include hypertension, proteinuria and renal insufficiency. Although markers of inflammation such as serum or urinary interleukin-6 (IL-6) and serum albumin have predicted progression in some studies, sensitive CRP (hs-CRP) has not been directly linked to the progression of IgAGN. Methods. A total of 174 ( 70 females) patients were invited for two visits 11 and 16 years ( medians) after IgAGN was diagnosed in renal biopsy. All patients had been diagnosed at least 5 years before the first visit. Progressive disease was defined as cystatin-C exceeding normal limits and showing over 20% elevation between the visits, or kidney transplantation or start of dialysis. Cystatin-C and creatinine clearance, serum hs-CRP, s-albumin, s-IL-6 and white blood cell count (WBC) were available for analysis from 118 patients. Results. IgAGN was progressive in 19.5% of the patients on the second visit. Hs-CRP, s-albumin and WBC of the first visit were significantly associated with the progression of IgAGN ( P = 0.014; P = 0.0001; P = 0.023, respectively). S-IL-6 was not associated with the progression. All inflammatory variables correlated significantly with the concurrent level of kidney function. Possible study limitations are the relatively low number of outcomes in the study groups, and the lack of generally accepted definitions for disease progression. Conclusions. Our results suggest that inflammatory markers hs-CRP, s-albumin and WBC are associated with the progression of IgAGN.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据