4.6 Article

Smokeless and Flavored Tobacco Products in the U.S. 2009 Styles Survey Results

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
卷 42, 期 1, 页码 29-36

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.08.019

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: A number of noncigarette tobacco products, including some novel products, recently have been marketed by the tobacco industry, which raises concerns from tobacco control authorities. Purpose: This study aimed to assess current popularity of several noncigarette tobacco products in the U.S. Methods: In 2009, a total of 10,587 adults completed a consumer mail-in survey (ConsumerStyles). Based on survey results, the weighted percentages of adults who heard and tried snus, dissolvable tobacco products, flavored little cigars, and flavored cigarettes were computed in 2010. A subset of this sample (n=4556) completed the HealthStyles survey, which included items about health perceptions of these products and use in the past 30 days. Results: The percentage of U. S. adults in the sample who were aware of these products ranged from 10.4% (dissolvable tobacco) to 44.6% (flavored little cigars). One third of adults who had heard of flavored little cigars tried them and 10.1% had used them in the past 30 days; among those who had heard of them, 27.4% tried flavored cigarettes and 12.6% tried snus. In general, young adults, men, and smokers were most likely to have heard of each product. At least one third of adults were uncertain if these products were as harmful as cigarettes (range=37.3% [snus] to 50.3% [dissolvable tobacco]). Conclusions: The awareness of these tobacco products in this sample varied. Groups with a higher prevalence of smoking and tobacco use (e. g., men, people with low levels of education) may be a target audience for marketing and promotions. As availability of products change, continued surveillance is warranted in the U. S. (Am J Prev Med 2012;42(1):29-36) Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Journal of Preventive Medicine

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据