4.6 Article

Population Estimates of Sickle Cell Disease in the US

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
卷 38, 期 4, 页码 S512-S521

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.12.022

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The number of individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD) in the U S is unknown Determination of burden of disease, healthcare issues, and policies is best served by representative estimations of the SCD population Purpose: To update SCD population estimates by using recent U.S. Census and birth-cohort SCD prevalence for at-risk populations as available through the centralized reporting of universal newborn screening for hemoglobinopathies, with an effort to demonstrate the potential effect of early mortality. Methods: National and state SCD populations were estimated based on the 2008 U S Census, using total, African-American, and Hispanic birth-cohort disease prevalence derived from the National Newborn Screening Information System. Estimates were corrected for early mortality for sickle cell anemia using data from the CDC's Compressed Mortality Report and published patient-cohort survival information. Results: National SCD population estimates ranged from 104,000 to 138,900, based on birth-cohort disease prevalence, but from 72,000 to 98,000 when corrected for early mortality Several limitations were noted in the available data, particularly for SCD mortality in adults. Conclusions: The number of individuals with SCD in the U S. may approach 100,000, even when accounting for the effect of early mortality on estimations A paucity of high-quality data limits appropriate estimation State-to-state variability may preclude application of state-specific information to other states or to the nation as a whole Standardized collection and centralized reporting, a surveillance system, will be necessary to assess the size and composition of the U S. SCD population (Am J Prey Med 2010,38(4S) S512-S521) (C) 2010 American Journal of Preventive Medicine

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据