期刊
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
卷 36, 期 5, 页码 452-457出版社
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002
关键词
-
资金
- National Cancer Institute [1R21CA126325-01, 1R21CA126990-01, 1R21CA126326-01, 1R21CA126373-01, 1R21CA126450-01, 1R21CA126321-01]
Public health is moving toward the goal of implementing evidence-based interventions. To accomplish this, there is a need to select, adapt, and evaluate intervention studies. Such selection relies, in part, on making judgments about the feasibility of possible interventions and determining whether comprehensive and multilevel evaluations are justified. There exist few published standards and guides to aid these judgments. This article describes the diverse types of feasibility studies conducted in the field of cancer prevention, using a group of recently funded grants from the National Cancer Institute. The grants were submitted in response to a request for applications proposing research to identify feasible interventions for increasing the utilization of the Cancer Information Service among underserved populations. (Am J Prev Med 2009;36(5):452-457) (c) 2009 Published by Elsevier Inc. oil behalf of American Journal of Preventive Medicine.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据