4.3 Review

The therapeutic potential of hydrogen sulfide: separating hype from hope

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00045.2011

关键词

hydrogen sulfide-donating drugs; vasoactivity; ischemia reperfusion injury; sulfur cycle; gasotransmitter

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [IOS 0641436]
  2. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences [1051627] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Olson KR. The therapeutic potential of hydrogen sulfide: separating hype from hope. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 301: R297-R312, 2011. First published May 4, 2011; doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00045.2011.-Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) has become the hot new signaling molecule that seemingly affects all organ systems and biological processes in which it has been investigated. It has also been shown to have both proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory actions and proapoptotic and anti-apoptotic effects and has even been reported to induce a hypometabolic state (suspended animation) in a few vertebrates. The exuberance over potential clinical applications of natural and synthetic H2S-donating compounds is understandable and a number of these function-targeted drugs have been developed and show clinical promise. However, the concentration of H2S in tissues and blood, as well as the intrinsic factors that affect these levels, has not been resolved, and it is imperative to address these points to distinguish between the physiological, pharmacological, and toxicological effects of this molecule. This review will provide an overview of H2S metabolism, a summary of many of its reported physiological actions, and it will discuss the recent development of a number of H2S-donating drugs that show clinical potential. It will also examine some of the misconceptions of H2S chemistry that have appeared in the literature and attempt to realign the definition of physiological H2S concentrations upon which much of this exuberance has been established.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据