4.4 Article

Hydrogen sulfide inhibits myocardial injury induced by homocysteine in rats

期刊

AMINO ACIDS
卷 34, 期 4, 页码 573-585

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00726-007-0011-8

关键词

homocysteine; hydrogen sulfide; sulfur containing amino acids; oxidative stress; endoplasmic reticulum stress

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hyperhomocysteinemia (HHcy) is a critical independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. However, to date, no satisfactory strategies to prevent HHcy exist. Since homocysteine (Hcy) and endogenous H2S are both metabolites of sulfur-containing amino acids, we aimed to investigate whether a metabolic product of Hcy and H2S, may antagonize in part the cardiovascular effects of Hcy. In the HHcy rat model injected subcutaneously with Hcy for 3 weeks, H2S levels and the H2S-generating enzyme cystathionine gamma lyase (CSE) activity in the myocardium were decreased. The intraperitoneal injection of H2S gas saturation solution significantly reduced plasma total Hcy (tHcy) concentration and decreased lipid peroxidation formation (i.e., lowered manodialdehyde and conjugated diene levels in myocardia and plasma). The activities of myocardial mitochondrial respiratory enzymes succinate dehydrogenase, cytochrome oxidase, and manganese superoxide dismutase, related to reactive oxygen species metabolism, were significantly dysfunctional in HHcy rats. The H2S administration restored the level of enzyme activities and accelerated the scavenging of H2O2 and superoxide anion generated by Hcy in isolated mitochondria. The H2S treatment also inhibited the expression of glucose-regulated protein 78, a marker of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, induced by Hcy in vivo and in vitro. Thus, HHcy impaired the myocardial CSE/H2S pathway, and the administration of H2S protected the myocardium from oxidative and ER stress induced by HHcy, which suggests that an endogenous metabolic balance of sulfur-containing amino acids may be a novel strategy for treatment of HHcy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据