4.3 Article

Sex-related changes in cardiac function following myocardial infarction in mice

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.90342.2008

关键词

contractility; pressure-volume loops

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [P01-HL-62426, T32-HL-07692] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent awareness of cardiovascular diseases as a number one killer of the middle-aged women has prompted interest in sex differences leading to heart failure (HF). Therefore, we evaluated cardiac function in female and male mice following myocardial infarction (MI) using the Millar pressure-volume (P-V) conductance system in vivo, at time points corresponding to early (2 wk), late compensatory hypertrophy (4 wk), and decompensation (10 wk) to HF. A significant deterioration of the load dependent and independent hemodynamic measurements occurred in both female and male mice during the early phase of hypertrophy. Later, compensatory hypertrophy was marked by a normalization of volumes to control levels in females compared with males. The most notable differences between sexes occurred in the measurements of cardiac contractility during the decompensation to HF. In females, there was a significant improvement in contractility compared with males, which was apparent in the load-independent measurements of preload recruitable stroke work (10 wk post-MI, female = 48.7 +/- 8.0 vs. male = 25.2 +/- 1.8 mmHg, P < 0.05) and maximum dP/dt vs. maximum end-diastolic volume (10 wk post-MI, female = 359 +/- 58 vs. male = 149 +/- 28 mmHg.s(-1).mu l(-1), P < 0.05). Despite these differences, there were no differences in the heart weight to body weight ratio and infarct size between the sexes. These data demonstrate that compensatory hypertrophy is associated with an improvement in contractility and a delayed decompensation to HF in females. However, compensatory hypertrophy in males appears to be undermined by a steady decline in contractility associated with decompensation to HF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据