4.3 Article

Amiloride-sensitive NaCl taste responses are associated with genetic variation of ENaC alpha-subunit in mice

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00420.2007

关键词

salt taste; amiloride sensitivity; epithelial sodium channel; single nucleotide polymorphisms; nerve recording

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DEAFNESS AND OTHER COMMUNICATION DISORDERS [R01DC000882] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIDCD NIH HHS [R01 DC000882-24, R01 DC000882, R01 DC00882] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An epithelial Na+ channel (ENaC) is expressed in taste cells and may be involved in the salt taste transduction. ENaC activity is blocked by amiloride, which in several mammalian species also inhibits taste responses to NaCl. In mice, lingual application of amiloride inhibits NaCl responses in the chorda tympani (CT) gustatory nerve much stronger in the C57BL/6 (B6) strain than in the 129P3/J (129) strain. We examined whether this strain difference is related to gene sequence variation or mRNA expression of three ENaC subunits (alpha, beta, gamma). Real-time RT-PCR and in situ hybridization detected no significant strain differences in expression of all three ENaC subunits in fungiform papillae. Sequences of the beta- and gamma ENaC subunit genes were also similar in the B6 and 129 strains, but alpha ENaC gene had three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). One of these SNPs resulted in a substitution of arginine in the B6 strain to tryptophan in the 129 strain (R616W) in the alpha ENaC protein. To examine association of this SNP with amiloride sensitivity of CT responses to NaCl, we produced F2 hybrids between B6 and 129 strains. Amiloride inhibited CT responses to NaCl in F-2 hybrids with B6/129 and B6/B6 alpha ENaC R616W genotypes stronger than in F-2 hybrids with 129/129 genotype. This suggests that the R616W variation in the alpha ENaC subunit affects amiloride sensitivity of the ENaC channel and provides evidence that ENaC is involved in amiloride-sensitive salt taste responses in mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据