4.3 Article

Exercise accelerates cutaneous wound healing and decreases wound inflammation in aged mice

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00177.2007

关键词

exercise wound inflammation; cytokine; aging

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [R01 AG023580] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM55238] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM055238] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG023580] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of exercise on wound healing and inflammation in young (3 mo) and old (18 mo) female BALB/cByJ mice. Mice were assigned to either exercise or sedentary control (control) groups. The exercise group mice were run on a motorized treadmill at a moderate intensity 30 min/day for 8 days. All mice were given four full-thickness dermal wounds, and the rate of wound closure was assessed daily for 10 days. Four months later, the aged mice were rerandomized to treatment, wounded again in different locations, and wounds were harvested at 1, 3, or 5 days postwounding. Wound tissue was analyzed for IL-1 beta, IL-6, keratinocyte chemoattractant (KC), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and TNF-alpha protein. Myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity and F4/80 mRNA were assessed as an indirect measure of neutrophil and macrophage content, respectively. There was a trend (P = 0.10) for exercise to reduce wound size in young mice, and exercise significantly (P < 0.05) decreased wound size in old mice. TNF-alpha, KC, and MCP-1 were significantly (P , 0.05) lower in wounds from exercised old mice compared with control. No group differences were found for wound IL-1 beta or IL-6, MPO activity, or F4/80 mRNA. Our data suggest that exercise accelerates the wound healing process in old mice. This improved healing response in the old mice may be the result of an exercise-induced anti-inflammatory response in the wound.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据