4.5 Article

Proteasome inhibition improves diaphragm function in congestive heart failure rats

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajplung.00035.2008

关键词

myosin; bortezomib; single fiber contractility; myosin

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES [R01AR052511] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIAMS NIH HHS [R01 AR052511, R01 AR052511-01A2, AR-052511] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In congestive heart failure (CHF), diaphragm weakness is known to occur and is associated with myosin loss and activation of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. The effect of modulating proteasome activity on myosin loss and diaphragm function is unknown. The present study investigated the effect of in vivo proteasome inhibition on myosin loss and diaphragm function in CHF rats. Coronary artery ligation was used as an animal model for CHF. Sham-operated rats served as controls. Animals were treated with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib ( intravenously) or received saline ( 0.9%) injections. Force generating capacity, cross-bridge cycling kinetics, and myosin content were measured in diaphragm single fibers. Proteasome activity, caspase-3 activity, and MuRF-1 and MAFbx mRNA levels were determined in diaphragm homogenates. Proteasome activities in the diaphragm were significantly reduced by bortezomib. Bortezomib treatment significantly improved diaphragm single fiber force generating capacity ( similar to 30-40%) and cross-bridge cycling kinetics (similar to 20%) in CHF. Myosin content was similar to 30% higher in diaphragm fibers from bortezomib-treated CHF rats than saline. Caspase-3 activity was decreased in diaphragm homogenates from bortezomib-treated rats. CHF increased MuRF-1 and MAFbx mRNA expression in the diaphragm, and bortezomib treatment diminished this rise. The present study demonstrates that treatment with a clinically used proteasome inhibitor improves diaphragm function by restoring myosin content in CHF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据