4.6 Article

Interactions between A2A adenosine receptors, hydrogen peroxide, and KATP channels in coronary reactive hyperemia

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00637.2012

关键词

coronary circulation; ischemic vasodilatation; adenosine receptors; reactive oxygen species

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [HL-027339, HL-094447, HL-071802, T32-HL-090610]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Myocardial metabolites such as adenosine mediate reactive hyperemia, in part, by activating ATP-dependent K+ (K-ATP) channels in coronary smooth muscle. In this study, we investigated the role of adenosine A(2A) and A(2B) receptors and their signaling mechanisms in reactive hyperemia. We hypothesized that coronary reactive hyperemia involves A(2A) receptors, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and K-ATP channels. We used A(2A) and A(2B) knockout (KO) and A(2A/2B) double KO (DKO) mouse hearts for Langendorff experiments. Flow debt for a 15-s occlusion was repaid 128 +/- 8% in hearts from wild-type (WT) mice; this was reduced in hearts from A(2A) KO and A(2A/2B) DKO mice (98 +/- 9 and 105 +/- 6%; P < 0.05), but not A(2B) KO mice (123 +/- 13%). Patch-clamp experiments demonstrated that adenosine activated glibenclamide-sensitive KATP current in smooth muscle cells from WT and A(2B) KO mice (90 +/- 23% of WT) but not A(2A) KO or A(2A)/A(2B) DKO mice (30 +/- 4 and 35 +/- 8% of WT; P < 0.05). Additionally, H2O2 activated K-ATP current in smooth muscle cells (358 +/- 99%; P < 0.05). Catalase, an enzyme that breaks down H2O2, attenuated adenosine-induced coronary vasodilation, reducing the percent increase in flow from 284 +/- 53 to 89 +/- 13% (P < 0.05). Catalase reduced the repayment of flow debt in hearts from WT mice (84 +/- 9%; P < 0.05) but had no effect on the already diminished repayment in hearts from A(2A) KO mice (98 +/- 7%). Our findings suggest that adenosine A(2A) receptors are coupled to smooth muscle K-ATP channels in reactive hyperemia via the production of H2O2 as a signaling intermediate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据