4.6 Article

Assessment of cerebral autoregulation: the quandary of quantification

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00328.2012

关键词

cerebral blood flow; autoregulation; blood vessel; circulation

资金

  1. New Zealand National Heart Foundation Grant [1284]
  2. Health Research Council Grant [09/186]
  3. United States Department of Defense Medical Research and Material Command Grant [W81XWH-11-2-0137]
  4. Canada Research Chair and Natural Sciences and Engineering Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tzeng YC, Ainslie PN, Cooke WH, Peebles KC, Willie CK, MacRae BA, Smirl JD, Horsman HM, Rickards CA. Assessment of cerebral autoregulation: the quandary of quantification. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 303: H658-H671, 2012. First published July 20, 2012; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00328.2012.-We assessed the convergent validity of commonly applied metrics of cerebral autoregulation (CA) to determine the extent to which the metrics can be used interchangeably. To examine between-subject relationships among low-frequency (LF; 0.07-0.2 Hz) and very-low-frequency (VLF; 0.02-0.07 Hz) transfer function coherence, phase, gain, and normalized gain, we performed retrospective transfer function analysis on spontaneous blood pressure and middle cerebral artery blood velocity recordings from 105 individuals. We characterized the relationships (n = 29) among spontaneous transfer function metrics and the rate of regulation index and autoregulatory index derived from bilateral thigh-cuff deflation tests. In addition, we analyzed data from subjects (n = 29) who underwent a repeated squat-to-stand protocol to determine the relationships between transfer function metrics during forced blood pressure fluctuations. Finally, data from subjects (n = 16) who underwent step changes in end-tidal PCO2 (PETCO2) were analyzed to determine whether transfer function metrics could reliably track the modulation of CA within individuals. CA metrics were generally unrelated or showed only weak to moderate correlations. Changes in PETCO2 were positively related to coherence [LF: beta = 0.0065 arbitrary units (AU)/mmHg and VLF: beta = 0.011 AU/mmHg, both P < 0.01] and inversely related to phase (LF: beta = -0.026 rad/mmHg and VLF: beta = -0.018 rad/mmHg, both P < 0.01) and normalized gain (LF: beta = -0.042%/mmHg(2) and VLF: beta = -0.013%/ mmHg(2), both P < 0.01). However, PETCO2 was positively associated with gain (LF: beta = 0.0070 cm.s(-1.)mmHg(-2), P < 0.05; and VLF: beta = 0.014 cm.s(-1).mmHg(-2), P < 0.01). Thus, during changes in PETCO2, LF phase was inversely related to LF gain (beta = -0.29 cm.s(-1).mmHg(-1).rad(-1), P < 0.01) but positively related to LF normalized gain (beta = 1.3% mmHg(-1)/rad, P < 0.01). These findings collectively suggest that only select CA metrics can be used interchangeably and that interpretation of these measures should be done cautiously.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据