4.6 Article

β-Arrestin-biased AT1R stimulation promotes cell survival during acute cardiac injury

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00475.2012

关键词

angiotensin; receptor; pharmacology; contractility; apoptosis

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [HL56687, HL75443]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Kim KS, Abraham D, Williams B, Violin JD, Mao L, Rockman HA. beta-Arrestin-biased AT1R stimulation promotes cell survival during acute cardiac injury. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 303: H1001-H1010, 2012. First published August 10, 2012; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00475.2012.-Pharmacological blockade of the ANG II type 1 receptor (AT1R) is a common therapy for treatment of congestive heart failure and hypertension. Increasing evidence suggests that selective engagement of beta-arrestin-mediated AT1R signaling, referred to as biased signaling, promotes cardioprotective signaling. Here, we tested the hypothesis that a beta-arrestin-biased AT1R ligand TRV120023 would confer cardioprotection in response to acute cardiac injury compared with the traditional AT1R blocker (ARB), losartan. TRV120023 promotes cardiac contractility, assessed by pressure-volume loop analyses, while blocking the effects of endogenous ANG II. Compared with losartan, TRV120023 significantly activates MAPK and Akt signaling pathways. These hemodynamic and biochemical effects were lost in beta-arrestin-2 knockout (KO) mice. In response to cardiac injury induced by ischemia reper-fusion injury or mechanical stretch, pretreatment with TRV120023 significantly diminishes cell death compared with losartan, which did not appear to be cardioprotective. This cytoprotective effect was lost in beta-arrestin-2 KO mice. The beta-arrestin-biased AT1R ligand, TRV120023, has cardioprotective and functional properties in vivo, which are distinct from losartan. Our data suggest that this novel class of drugs may provide an advantage over conventional ARBs by supporting cardiac function and reducing cellular injury during acute cardiac injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据