4.7 Article

Exercise promotes angiogenesis and improves β-adrenergic receptor signalling in the post-ischaemic failing rat heart

期刊

CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH
卷 78, 期 2, 页码 385-394

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvm109

关键词

heart failure; exercise training; angiogenesis; vascular endothelial growth factor; beta-adrenergic receptor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims We investigated whether exercise training could promote angiogenesis and improve blood perfusion and left ventricular (LV) remodelling of the post-myocardial infarction (MI) failing heart. We also explored the contribution of ameliorated beta-adrenergic receptor signalling and function on the overall improvement of cardiac contractility reserve induced by exercise. Methods and results Adult Wistar mate rats were randomly assigned to one of four experimental groups. Sham-operated and post-MI heart failure (HF) rats were housed under sedentary conditions or assigned to 10-weeks of a treadmill exercise protocol. At 4 weeks after MI, sedentary HF rats showed Weccentric hypertrophy, marked increase of LV diameters associated with severely impaired fractional shortening (14 +/- 5%), increased LV end diastolic pressure (20.9 +/- 2.6 mmHg), and pulmonary congestion. In addition, cardiac contractile responses to adrenergic stimulation were significantly blunted. In trained HF rats, exercise was able to (i) reactivate the cardiac vascular endothelial growth factor pathway with a concurrent enhancement of myocardial angiogenesis, (ii) significantly increase myocardial perfusion and coronary reserve, (iii) reduce cardiac diameters, and (iv) improve LV contractility in response to adrenergic stimulation. This latter finding was also associated with a significant improvement of cardiac beta-adrenergic receptor downregulation and desensitization. Conclusions Our data indicate that exercise favourably affects angiogenesis and improves W remodelling and contractility reserve in a rat model of severe chronic HF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据