4.6 Article

Long-term maternal cardiovascular function in a mouse model of sFlt-1-induced preeclampsia

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00792.2009

关键词

vascular reactivity; postpartum; blood pressure; adenovirus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bytautiene E, Lu F, Tamayo EH, Hankins GD, Longo M, Kublickiene K, Saade GR. Long-term maternal cardiovascular function in a mouse model of sFlt-1-induced preeclampsia. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 298: H189-H193, 2010. First published November 13, 2009; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00792.2009.-Our aim was to evaluate the long-term effects of preeclampsia on vascular function in a mouse model induced by sFlt-1 overexpression. CD-1 mice at day 8 of gestation were injected via the tail vein with adenovirus carrying sFlt1 (AdsFlt1), adenovirus carrying the murine IgG2 alpha Fc fragment as the adenovirus control (AdmFc), or saline. Vascular function in the mothers was investigated 6-8 mo after delivery by recording blood pressure (BP) by telemetry (AdsFlt1 n = 8, AdmFc n = 6, saline n = 4) and exploring carotid artery reactivity in a wire myograph (AdsFlt1 n = 6, AdmFc n = 8, saline n = 4). sFlt-1 blood levels at 6-8 mo postpartum had returned to low levels and were comparable between the three groups (P = 0.808). There was no statistically significant difference in BP (P = 0.067) or vascular reactivity between the three groups of postpartum mice (phenylephrine P = 0.079, thromboxane P = 0.979, serotonin P = 0.659, acetylcholine P = 0.795, sodium nitroprusside P = 0.728, isoproterenol P = 0.370). Our results indicate that in a mouse model overexpression of sFlt-1 does not lead to increased in BP and altered vascular function in the absence of the pregnancy and has no long-term effect on BP and vascular function in the postpartum mothers. Our findings favor the hypothesis that increased cardiovascular diseases in women with history of preeclampsia are likely the result of preexisting risk factors common to preeclampsia and cardiovascular diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据