4.6 Review

The physiological role of endoglin in the cardiovascular system

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.01251.2009

关键词

nitric oxide; vascular malformations; angiogenesis; development

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [SAF2007-61827, SAF2007-63893]
  2. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [ISCIII-CIBER CB/06/07/0038, ISCIII-RD06/0016]
  3. Junta de Castilla y Leon [GR100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lopez-Novoa JM, Bernabeu C. The physiological role of endoglin in the cardiovascular system. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 299: H959-H974, 2010. First published July 23, 2010; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.01251.2009.-Endoglin (CD105) is an integral membrane glycoprotein that serves as a coreceptor for members of the transforming growth factor-beta superfamily of proteins. A major role for endoglin in regulating transforming growth factor-beta-dependent vascular remodeling and angiogenesis has been postulated based on the following: 1) endoglin is the gene mutated in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia type 1, a disease characterized by vascular malformations; 2) endoglin knockout mice die at midgestation because of defective angiogenesis; 3) endoglin is overexpressed in neoangiogenic vessels, during inflammation, and in solid tumors; and 4) endoglin regulates the expression and activity of endothelial nitric oxide synthase, which is involved in angiogenesis and vascular tone. Besides the predominant form of the endoglin receptor (long endoglin isoform), two additional forms of endoglin have been recently reported to play a role in the vascular pathology and homeostasis: the alternatively spliced short endoglin isoform and a soluble endoglin form that is proteolytically cleaved from membrane-bound endoglin. The purpose of this review is to underline the role that the different forms of endoglin play in regulating angiogenesis, vascular remodeling, and vascular tone, as well as to analyze the molecular and cellular mechanisms supporting these effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据