4.6 Article

Equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 plays an essential role in cardioprotection

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00711.2009

关键词

cardiovascular; hypoxia; adenosine; cardiomyocytes

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP-33033]
  2. Ontario Graduate Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rose JB, Naydenova Z, Bang A, Eguchi M, Sweeney G, Choi DS, Hammond JR, Coe IR. Equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 plays an essential role in cardioprotection. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 298: H771-H777, 2010. First published December 24, 2009; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00711.2009.-To better understand the role of equilibrative nucleoside transporters (ENT) in purine nucleoside-dependent physiology of the cardiovascular system, we investigated whether the ENT1-null mouse heart was cardioprotected in response to ischemia (coronary occlusion for 30 min followed by reperfusion for 2 h). We observed that ENT1-null mouse hearts showed significantly less myocardial infarction compared with wild-type littermates. We confirmed that isolated wild-type adult mouse cardiomyocytes express predominantly ENT1, which is primarily responsible for purine nucleoside uptake in these cells. However, ENT1-null cardiomyocytes exhibit severely impaired nucleoside transport and lack ENT1 transcript and protein expression. Adenosine receptor expression profiles and expression levels of ENT2, ENT3, and ENT4 were similar in cardiomyocytes isolated from ENT1-null adult mice compared with cardiomyocytes isolated from wild-type littermates. Moreover, small interfering RNA knockdown of ENT1 in the cardiomyocyte cell line, HL-1, mimics findings in ENT1-null cardiomyocytes. Taken together, our data demonstrate that ENT1 plays an essential role in cardioprotection, most likely due to its effects in modulating purine nucleoside-dependent signaling and that the ENT1-null mouse is a powerful model system for the study of the role of ENTs in the physiology of the cardiomyocyte.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据