4.6 Article

Adenylyl cyclase type 5 protein expression during cardiac development and stress

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00050.2009

关键词

adenylyl cyclase isoforms; monoclonal antibody; pressure overload; hypertrophy

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL-069020, AG-023137, AG-028854, AG-014121, HL-095888, HL-033107, HL-059139, HL-069752, HL-093481, GM-69861]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hu C, Chandra R, Ge H, Pain J, Yan L, Babu G, Depre C, Iwatsubo K, Ishikawa Y, Sadoshima J, Vatner SF, Vatner DE. Adenylyl cyclase type 5 protein expression during cardiac development and stress. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 297: H1776-H1782, 2009. First published September 4, 2009; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00050.2009.-Adenylyl cyclase (AC) types 5 and 6 (AC5 and AC6) are the two major AC isoforms expressed in the mammalian heart that mediate signals from beta-adrenergic receptor stimulation. Because of the unavailability of isoform-specific antibodies, it is difficult to ascertain the expression levels of AC5 protein in the heart. Here we demonstrated the successful generation of an AC5 isoform-specific mouse monoclonal antibody and studied the expression of AC5 protein during cardiac development in different mammalian species. The specificity of the antibody was confirmed using heart and brain tissues from AC5 knockout mice and from transgenic mice overexpressing AC5. In mice, the AC5 protein was highest in the brain but was also detectable in all organs studied, including the heart, brain, lung, liver, stomach, kidney, skeletal muscle, and vascular tissues. Western blot analysis showed that AC5 was most abundant in the neonatal heart and declined to basal levels in the adult heart. AC5 protein increased in the heart with pressure-overload left ventricular hypertrophy. Thus this new AC5 antibody demonstrated that this AC isoform behaves similarly to fetal type genes, such as atrial natriuretic peptide; i.e., it declines with development and increases with pressureoverload hypertrophy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据