4.6 Article

Impaired capsaicin-induced relaxation of coronary arteries in a porcine model of the metabolic syndrome

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.01191.2007

关键词

Ossabaw miniature swine; transient receptor potential vanilloid 1; potassium channels; nitric oxide; endothelial cells

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR-013223] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-062552, T32-HL-079995, HL-67804] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies implicate channels of the transient receptor potential vanilloid family (e. g., TRPV1) in regulating vascular tone; however, little is known about these channels in the coronary circulation. Furthermore, it is unclear whether metabolic syndrome alters the function and/or expression of TRPV1. We tested the hypothesis that TRPV1 mediates coronary vasodilation through endothelium-dependent mechanisms that are impaired by the metabolic syndrome. Studies were conducted on coronary arteries from lean and obese male Ossabaw miniature swine. In lean pigs, capsaicin, a TRPV1 agonist, relaxed arteries in a dose-dependent manner (EC50 = 116 +/- 41 nM). Capsaicin-induced relaxation was blocked by the TRPV1 antagonist capsazepine, endothelial denudation, inhibition of nitric oxide synthase, and K+ channel antagonists. Capsaicin-induced relaxation was impaired in rings from pigs with metabolic syndrome (91 +/- 4% vs. 51 +/- 10% relaxation at 100 mu M). TRPV1 immunoreactivity was prominent in coronary endothelial cells. TRPV1 protein expression was decreased 40 +/- 11% in obese pigs. Capsaicin (100 mu M) elicited divalent cation influx that was abolished in endothelial cells from obese pigs. These data indicate that TRPV1 channels are functionally expressed in the coronary circulation and mediate endothelium-dependent vasodilation through a mechanism involving nitric oxide and K+ channels. Impaired capsaicin-induced vasodilation in the metabolic syndrome is associated with decreased expression of TRPV1 and cation influx.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据