4.6 Article

Genomic deletion of estrogen receptors ER alpha and ER beta does not alter estrogen-mediated inhibition of Ca2+ influx and contraction in murine cardiomyocytes

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.01225.2007

关键词

L-type calcium channel; excitation-contraction coupling; cardiac electrophysiology

资金

  1. British Heart Foundation Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Estrogens modify contraction of vascular smooth muscle and cardiomyocytes, but suggestions that they confer protective effects on the cardiovascular system remain controversial. The negative inotropic effects of estrogens are a consequence of L- type Ca2+ channel inhibition, but the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. We tested the hypothesis that membrane-associated estrogen receptors ( ER)-alpha and -beta are involved. We measured the effect of estrogens on Ca2+ current ( ICaL) in isolated ventricular cardiomyocytes of wild-type (WT), ER alpha knockout (ER alpha KO), and ER beta KO mice using the whole cell patch-clamp technique at 37 C. No differences in current densities or inactivation profiles of ICaL were found under control conditions in WT, ER alpha KO, and ER beta KO cardiomyocytes, suggesting that absence of either ER has no effect on functional properties of ICaL. In all groups, application of raloxifene (2 mu M) or 17 alpha- or 17 beta- estradiol (50 mu M) reduced ICaL (P < 0.001). Raloxifene decreased ICaL by 44 +/- 9% ( mean +/- SE) in WT (n = 5), 34 +/- 5% in ER alpha KO (n = 5), and 30 +/- 5% in ER beta KO mice (n = 8). 17 alpha- Estradiol reduced ICaL by 41 +/- 10% in WT ( n= 4), 34 +/- 12% in ER alpha KO (n = 7), and 38 +/- 8% in ER beta KO mice (n = 7). 17 beta- Estradiol inhibited ICaL by 31 +/- 4% in WT ( n = 4), 28 +/- 6% in ER alpha KO (n = 3), and 42 +/- 3% in ER beta KO mice ( n = 5). Decreases in cell shortening occurred in parallel with these findings. Our results suggest that inhibition of ICaL and the decrease in contraction by estrogens do not depend on ER alpha or ER beta.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据