4.6 Article

Functionally distinct sodium channels in ventricular epicardial and endocardial cells contribute to a greater sensitivity of the epicardium to electrical depression

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.01327.2007

关键词

Brugada syndrome; acute ischemia; severe hyperkalemia

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-47678, R01 HL047678] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A greater depression of the action potential (AP) of the ventricular epicardium (Epi) versus endocardium (Endo) is readily observed in experimental models of acute ischemia and Brugada syndrome. Endo and Epi differences in transient outward K+ current and/or ATP-sensitive K+ channel current are believed to contribute to the differential response. The present study tested the hypothesis that the greater sensitivity of Epi is due in part to its functionally distinct early fast Na+ current (I-Na). APs were recorded from isolated Epi and Endo tissue slices and coronaryperfused wedge preparations before and after exposures to elevated extracellular K+ concentration ([K+](o); 6-12 mM). I-Na was recorded from Epi and Endo myocytes using whole cell patch-clamp techniques. In tissue slices, increasing [K+] o to 12 mM reduced V-max to 51.1 +/- 5.3% and 26.8 +/- 9.6% of control in Endo (n = 9) and Epi (n = 14), respectively (P < 0.05). In wedge preparations (n = 12), the increase in [K+](o) caused selective depression of Epi APs and transmural conduction slowing and block. I-Na density was not significantly different between Epi (n = 14) and Endo (n = 15) cells, but Epi cells displayed a more negative half-inactivation voltage [-83.6 +/- 0.1 and -75.5 +/- 0.3 mV for Epi (n = 16) and Endo (n = 16), respectively, P < 0.05]. Our data suggest that reduced I-Na availability in ventricular Epi may contribute to its greater sensitivity to electrical depression and thus may contribute to the R-ST segment changes observed under a variety of clinical conditions including acute myocardial ischemia, severe hyperkalemia, and Brugada syndrome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据