4.6 Article

Angiotensin II and tumor necrosis factor-alpha synergistically promote monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 expression: roles of NF-kappa B, p38, and reactive oxygen species

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.91406.2007

关键词

blood vessels; signaling pathway; atherosclerosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We examined whether ANG II and TNF-alpha cooperatively induce vascular inflammation using the expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 as a marker of vascular inflammation. ANG II and TNF-alpha stimulated MCP-1 expression in a synergistic manner in vascular smooth muscle cells. ANG II-induced MCP-1 expression was potently inhibited to a nonstimulated basal level by blockade of the p38-dependent pathway but only partially inhibited by blockade of the NF-kappa B-dependent pathway. In contrast, TNF-alpha-induced MCP-1 expression was potently suppressed by blockade of NF-kappa B activation but only modestly suppressed by blockade of p38 activation. ANG II-and TNF-alpha-induced activation of NF-kappa B- and p38-dependent pathways was partially inhibited by pharmacological inhibitors of ROS production. Furthermore, ANG II-and TNF-alpha-stimulated MCP-1 expression was partially suppressed by ROS inhibitors. We also examined whether endogenous ANG II and TNF-alpha cooperatively promote vascular inflammation in vivo using a wire injury model of the rat femoral artery. Blockade of both ANG II and TNF-alpha further suppressed neointimal formation, macrophage infiltration, and MCP-1 expression in an additive manner compared with blockade of ANG II or TNF-alpha alone. These results suggested that ANG II and TNF-alpha synergistically stimulate MCP-1 expression via the utilization of distinct intracellular signaling pathways (p38- and NF kappa B-dependent pathways) and that these pathways are activated in ROS-dependent and -independent manners. These results also suggest that ANG II and TNF-alpha cooperatively stimulate vascular inflammation in vivo as well as in vitro.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据