4.6 Article

Effects of delayed gastric emptying on postprandial glucose kinetics, insulin sensitivity, and β-cell function

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.00199.2014

关键词

gastric emptying; insulin action; pramlintide

资金

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases from the National Center for Advancing Translational Science [DK-R01-085516, DK-DP3-094331, UL1-TR-000135]
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  3. Italian Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Universita e della Ricerca
  4. [DK-29953]
  5. [DK-90541]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Controlling meal-related glucose excursions continues to be a therapeutic challenge in diabetes mellitus. Mechanistic reasons for this need to be understood better to develop appropriate therapies. To investigate delayed gastric emptying effects on postprandial glucose turnover, insulin sensitivity, and beta-cell responsivity and function, as a feasibility study prior to studying patients with type 1 diabetes, we used the triple tracer technique C-peptide and oral minimal model approach in healthy subjects. A single dose of 30 mu g of pramlintide administered at the start of a mixed meal was used to delay gastric emptying rates. With delayed gastric emptying rates, peak rate of meal glucose appearance was delayed, and rate of endogenous glucose production (EGP) was lower. C-peptide and oral minimal models enabled the assessments of beta-cell function, insulin sensitivity, and beta-cell responsivity simultaneously. Delayed gastric emptying induced by pramlintide improved total insulin sensitivity and decreased total beta-cell responsivity. However, beta-cell function as measured by total disposition index did not change. The improved whole body insulin sensitivity coupled with lower rate of appearance of EGP with delayed gastric emptying provides experimental proof of the importance of evaluating pramlintide in artificial endocrine pancreas approaches to reduce postprandial blood glucose variability in patients with type 1 diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据