4.6 Article

Metformin prevents liver tumorigenesis induced by high-fat diet in C57Bl/6 mice

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.00133.2013

关键词

adipose tissue inflammation; antitumor effect; liver tumorigenesis; metformin; nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan [19390251, 21390282]
  2. Japan Medical Association
  3. Uehara Memorial Foundation
  4. Daiichi-Sankyo Foundation of Life Science
  5. Naito Foundation
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23591316, 19390251] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is increasing with the growing epidemics of obesity and diabetes. NAFLD encompasses a clinicopathologic spectrum of disease ranging from isolated hepatic steatosis to NASH, which is a more aggressive form of fatty liver disease, to cirrhosis and, finally, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The exact mechanism behind the development of HCC in NASH remains unclear; however, it has been established that hepatic steatosis is the important risk factor in the development of HCC. Metformin has recently drawn attention because of its potential antitumor effect. Here, we investigated the effects of metformin on high-fat diet (HFD)-induced liver tumorigenesis, using a mouse model of NASH and liver tumor. Metformin prevented long-term HFD-induced liver tumorigenesis in C57Bl/6 mice. Of note, metformin failed to protect against liver tumorigenesis in mice that had already begun to develop NAFLD. Metformin improved short-term HFD-induced fat accumulation in the liver, associated with the suppression of adipose tissue inflammation. Collectively, these results suggest that metformin may prevent liver tumorigenesis via suppression of liver fat accumulation in the early stage, before the onset of NAFLD, which seems to be associated with a delay in the development of inflammation of the adipose tissue.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据