4.6 Article

G9a is transactivated by C/EBP beta to facilitate mitotic clonal expansion during 3T3-L1 preadipocyte differentiation

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.00608.2012

关键词

C/EBP beta; G9a; mitotic clonal expansion

资金

  1. National Key Basic Research Project Grants [2011CB910201, 2013CB530601]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation [81270954, 30870510, 31000603]
  3. State Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation [31030048]
  4. Shanghai Rising Star Program [08QA14012]
  5. Shanghai New Excellent Medicine Talents Program [XYQ2011037]
  6. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology at Fudan University Shanghai Medical College
  7. Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Projects [985III-YFX0302]
  8. Novartis-Fudan collaboration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In 3T3-L1 preadipocyte differentiation, the CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein-beta (C/EBP beta) is an important early transcription factor that activates cell cycle genes during mitotic clonal expansion (MCE), sequentially activating peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma(PPAR gamma) and C/EBP alpha during terminal differentiation. Although C/EBP beta acquires its DNA binding activity via dual phosphorylation at about 12- 16 h postinduction, the expression of PPAR gamma and C/EBP beta is not induced until 36-72 h. The delayed expression of PPAR gamma and C/EBP alpha ensures the progression of MCE, but the mechanism responsible for the delay remains elusive. We provide evidence that G9a, a major euchromatic methyltransferase, is transactivated by C/EBP beta and represses PPAR gamma and C/EBP alpha through H3K9 dimethylation of their promoters during MCE. Inhibitor-or siRNA-mediated G9a downregulation modestly enhances PPAR gamma and C/EBP alpha expression and adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes. Conversely, forced expression of G9a impairs the accumulation of triglycerides. Thus, this study elucidates an epigenetic mechanism for the delayed expression of PPAR gamma and C/ EBP alpha.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据