4.6 Article

Effect of 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase-1 inhibition on hepatic glucose metabolism in the conscious dog

期刊

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.00740.2009

关键词

endogenous glucose production; cortisol; glucocorticoids; hepatic cortisol production

资金

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [DK-18243, DK-29953]
  2. Diabetes Research and Training Center [SP-60-AM20593]
  3. Center for Translational Science Activities [UL1-RR2415]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Edgerton DS, Basu R, Ramnanan CJ, Farmer TD, Neal D, Scott M, Jacobson P, Rizza RA, Cherrington AD. Effect of 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase-1 inhibition on hepatic glucose metabolism in the conscious dog. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 298: E1019-E1026, 2010. First published February 16, 2010; doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00740.2009.-Inactive cortisone is converted to active cortisol within the liver by 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase-1 (11 beta-HSD1), and impaired regulation of this process may be related to increased hepatic glucose production (HGP) in individuals with type 2 diabetes. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effect of acute 11 beta-HSD1 inhibition on HGP and fat metabolism during insulin deficiency. Sixteen conscious, 42-h-fasted, lean, healthy dogs were studied. Somatostatin was infused to create insulin deficiency, and the animals were treated with a specific 11 beta-HSD1 inhibitor (compound 531) or placebo for 5 h. 11 beta-HSD1 inhibition completely suppressed hepatic cortisol production, and this attenuated the increase in HGP that occurred during insulin deficiency. PEPCK and glucose-6-phosphatase expression were decreased when 11 beta-HSD1 was inhibited, but gluconeogenic flux was unchanged, implying an effect on glycogenolysis. Since inhibition of hepatic cortisol production reduces HGP during insulin deficiency, 11 beta-HSD1 is a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of excess glucose production that occurs in diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据