4.7 Article

A mechanosensitive ion channel regulating cell volume

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-CELL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 298, 期 6, 页码 C1424-C1430

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00503.2009

关键词

cytoskeleton; GsMTx4; intracellular Ca2+; regulatory volume decrease; stretch-activated channels

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [DK-77302, HL-054887]
  2. New York State Office of Science, Technology & Academic Research (NYSTAR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hua SZ, Gottlieb PA, Heo J, Sachs F. A mechanosensitive ion channel regulating cell volume. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 298: C1424-C1430, 2010. First published March 24, 2010; doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00503.2009.-Cells respond to a hyposmotic challenge by swelling and then returning toward the resting volume, a process known as the regulatory volume decrease or RVD. The sensors for this process have been proposed to include cationic mechanosensitive ion channels that are opened by membrane tension. We tested this hypothesis using a microfluidic device to measure cell volume and the peptide GsMTx4, a specific inhibitor of cationic mechanosensitive channels. GsMTx4 had no effect on RVD in primary rat astrocytes or Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells but was able to completely inhibit RVD and the associated Ca2+ uptake in normal rat kidney (NRK-49F) cells in a dose-dependent manner. Gadolinium (Gd3+), a nonspecific blocker of many mechanosensitive channels, inhibited RVD and Ca2+ uptake in all three cell types, demonstrating the existence of at least two types of volume sensors. Single-channel stretch-activated currents are present in outside-out patches from NRK-49F, MDCK, and astrocytes, and they are reversibly inhibited by GsMTx4. While mechanosensitive channels are involved in volume regulation, their role for volume sensing is specialized. The NRK cells form a stable platform from which to screen drugs that affect volume regulation via mechanosensory channels and as a sensitive system to clone the channel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据