4.7 Article

Chloride transport in mitochondrion-rich cells of euryhaline tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) larvae

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-CELL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 297, 期 4, 页码 C845-C854

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00218.2009

关键词

Na+-Cl- cotransporter; osmoregulation; gills; ionocytes; ionoregulation

资金

  1. National Science Council of Taiwan [NSC 97-2313-B-003-001-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Horng JL, Hwang PP, Shih TH, Wen ZH, Lin CS, Lin LY. Chloride transport in mitochondrion-rich cells of euryhaline tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) larvae. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 297: C845-C854, 2009. First published August 5, 2009; doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00218.2009.-A noninvasive scanning ion-selective electrode technique (SIET) was applied to measure Cl- transport at individual mitochondrion-rich cells (MRCs) in the skin of euryhaline tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) larvae. In seawater (SW)-acclimated larvae, outward Cl- gradients (20 similar to 80 mM higher than the background) were measured at the surface, indicating a secretion of Cl- from the skin. By serial probing over the surface of MRCs and adjacent keratinocytes (KCs), a significant outward flux of Cl- was detected at the apical opening (membrane) of MRCs. Treatment with 100 mu M ouabain or bumetanide inhibited the Cl- secretion by similar to 75%. In freshwater (FW)-acclimated larvae, a lower level of outward Cl- gradients (0.2 similar to 1 mM) was measured at the skin surface. Low-Cl- water (similar to 0.005 mM) acclimation increased the apical Na+-Cl- cotransporter (NCC) immunoreactivity of MRCs in the larval skin. An inward flux of Cl- was detected when probing the exterior surface of a group of MRCs (convex-MRCs) that express the NCC. An NCC inhibitor (100 mu M metolazone) reduced the flux by similar to 90%. This study provides direct and convincing evidence for Cl- transport by MRCs of SW-and FW-acclimated euryhaline tilapia and the involvement of an apical NCC in Cl- uptake of MRCs of FW-acclimated fish.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据