4.3 Article

Effects of an attachment-based intervention on the cortisol production of infants and toddlers in foster care

期刊

DEVELOPMENT AND PSYCHOPATHOLOGY
卷 20, 期 3, 页码 845-859

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0954579408000400

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH052135-07, R01 MH052135, R01 MH052135-05, R01 MH052135-06A2, MH K02 74374, R01 MH052135-08, MH R01 52135, MH 65046] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies with nonhuman primates and rodents, as well as with human children, have suggested that early separations from caregivers are often associated with changes in the functioning of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. On the basis of these findings, we designed a relational intervention that was intended to normalize HPA functioning among children in foster care. This paper presents findings from a randomized clinical trial that assessed the effectiveness of a relational intervention (Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-up [ABC]) with regard to HPA functioning. The ABC intervention was intended to enhance children's ability to regulate physiology and behavior. The control intervention (Developmental Education for Families) was intended to enhance children's cognitive skills. A comparison group of children who had never been in foster care was also included. Children's cortisol production was assessed upon arrival at the lab, and 15 and 30 min following the Strange Situation. Random effects analyses of variance were performed to assess differences in initial values and change between children in the two intervention groups. Children in the ABC intervention and comparison group children showed lower initial values of cortisol than children in the treatment control group, considering arrival at lab as initial values (p < .05). Groups did not differ significantly in change overtime. These results suggest that the ABC intervention is effective in helping children regulate biology in ways more characteristic of children who have not experienced early adversity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据