3.8 Article

Features and risk factors of peripheral neuropathy during treatment with bortezomib for advanced multiple myeloma

期刊

CLINICAL LYMPHOMA & MYELOMA
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 146-152

出版社

CIG MEDIA GROUP, LP
DOI: 10.3816/CLM.2008.n.017

关键词

proteasome inhibition; sequential therapy; sensorimotor symptoms; thalidomide

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Bortezomib is a first-in-class proteasome inhibitor with remarkable antitumor activity that is approved for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma. Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is a frequent adverse event reported with bortezomib use. Patients and Methods: The aim of this retrospective, single-center study was to determine the characteristics of bortezornib-associated PN in 100 patients with advanced myeloma. Peripheral neuropathy was evaluated by investgator's assessment. Results: With a median follow-up of 8 months (range, 0.1-32 months) from bortezomib initiation, bortezornib-associated PN was observed in 38 patients (38%; 95% CI, 28%-47%), with grade 3 and 4 PN occurring in 5 patients and 1 patient, respectively. Median time to onset of bortezornib-associated PN was 53 days (range, 11-182 days). Of the 38 patients with bortezomib-associated PN, resolution or improvement occurred in 20 patients (53%) at a median of 3 months (range, 1-8 months). In multivariate analysis, the total number of cycles of bortezomib (< 4 cycles or > 4 cycles; P=.03; odds ratio [OR], 2.6; 95% CI, 1.1-6.1) and a previous history of thalidomide therapy (P=.02; OR5 3.9; 95% CI, 1.212.6) were significantly associated with an increased incidence of bortezomib-associated PN. Conclusion: We conclude that, though relatively frequent, bortezomib-associated PN is reversible in a majority of patents. However, bortezomib-associated PN seems to be dependent on previous therapy with thalidomide, suggesting that bortezomib followed by thalidomide could be an optimal sequence of administration of these drugs in the salvage setting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据