4.5 Article

Concurrent Validity of Administering the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Instrument by Interview

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181a9f1d6

关键词

FIM; Validity; Interview; Hip Fracture

资金

  1. National Institute on Aging [R01 AG15918-02]
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG015918] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [R01DA015918] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we measure the concurrent validity of administering the Functional Independence Measure instrument by interview. Data from 28 community-dwelling, cognitively intact, elderly patients with hip fracture were collected in 5 postacute rehabilitation facilities. Within 72 hrs of admission to (and at discharge from) the postacute facilities, both a Functional Independence Measure-certified interviewer and a multidisciplinary team administered the Functional Independence Measure instrument to each participant concurrently. At admission, the mean Functional Independence Measure ratings assigned by the interviewer and by the team were 84.3 and 80.5, respectively (P < 0.00 1). At discharge, the mean Functional Independence Measure ratings were 104.4 and 103.4 (P > 0.50), reflecting the participants' functional recovery during postacute rehabilitation. The intraclass correlation between the Functional Independence Measure ratings assigned by the interviewer and by the team was 0.74 (95% confidence interval = 0.58-0.91) at admission and 0.76 (95% confidence interval = 0.60-0.92) at discharge. Functional Independence Measure ratings assigned by Functional Independence Measure-certified interviewers are valid indicators of the functional status of groups of older people recovering from hip fracture and feasible for longitudinal study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据