期刊
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION
卷 88, 期 5, 页码 423-430出版社
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31819c59c6
关键词
Rehabilitation; Review Literature as Topic; Review (Publication Type); Research
资金
- National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR) [H 133AO60028]
Reviews offer examinations of published material on a topic, and are becoming indispensable in keeping up with an exponentially growing rehabilitation literature. Adherents of the systematic reviews that support evidence-based practice have been quite dismissive of narrative (traditional, qualitative, and nonsystematic) reviews. However, the types of problems that plague the latter may also be found in systematic reviews, which, in addition, have problems of their own. It is argued here that reviews play a number of roles in scientific research and professional practice such as answering specific clinical questions, pooling data, comparing research, synthesizing complementary studies, offering guidance in uncharted fields, and translating research between disciplinary traditions. For some of these purposes, systematic reviews are better; for others, a narrative review is more suitable. Both types can be improved to serve the reader better in keeping up with the literature.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据