4.3 Article

Female status, food security, and stature sexual dimorphism: Testing mate choice as a mechanism in human self-domestication

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY
卷 167, 期 3, 页码 458-469

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.23642

关键词

evolutionary anthropology; female social status; mate choice; self-domestication; sexual dimorphism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives Humans exhibit multiple anatomical and behavioral signatures of domestication syndrome, leading evolutionary-minded scholars to suggest Homo sapiens is a self-domesticated species. We examined one of three mechanisms proposed to explain human self-domesticationthat is, intersexual selection against reactive aggression. We hypothesized that this process has been, at least in part, caused by context-dependent female preferences for less-aggressive males. We predicted that societies where women have higher social status will show relatively elevated signs of self-domesticationas indicated by lower stature sexual dimorphism (SSD)and that this relationship should be mediated by food security. Materials and methodsResultsTo test our prediction, we used male and female stature data for 28 societies from the Standard Cross-Cultural Sample. We applied multivariate regression to examine our hypothesis while controlling for theoretically important confounders. We found convincing support for the prediction that the relationship between SSD and female status is mediated by food security. As predicted, higher female status was associated with less sexual dimorphism and the effect is stronger when food resources are secure. DiscussionContext-dependent female mate choices significantly contribute to lower SSD, suggesting female mate choice is likely to have played an influential role in human self-domestication. Future research on this theme will benefit by including more of the expected symptoms of human self-domestication and examining other potential drivers of this process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据