4.3 Article

Effects of Gut Passage, Feces, and Seed Handling on Latency and Rate of Germination in Seeds Consumed by Capuchins (Cebus capucinus)

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY
卷 138, 期 4, 页码 486-492

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.20982

关键词

seed dispersal; Cebus capucinus; Santa Rosa National Park; community ecology; quality

资金

  1. Province of Alberta Graduate Scholarship
  2. Queen Elizabeth 11 Provincial Scholarship
  3. Sigma Xi Grant-in-Aid of Research, The University of Calgary
  4. The Canada Research Chairs Program, The Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One of the key measures of the effectiveness of primary seed dispersal by animals is the quality of seed dispersal (Schupp: Plant Ecol 107/108 [1993] 15-29). We present data on quality of seed dispersal by two groups of white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus) in Costa Rica to test the hypothesis that capuchin seed handling results in effective primary dispersal for some fruit species they consume. We examined seed handling for 27 plant species, and germination rates of 18 species consumed by capuchins. For five of the most commonly swallowed seed species, we determined germination rates and average time to germination (latency) for seeds ingested and defecated by capuchins and compared these to seeds removed directly from fruit and planted. For the same five species, we compared germination rates and latency for passed seeds planted in capuchin feces to those cleaned of feces and planted in soil. For three of five species, differences in proportion of germinated seeds were significantly higher for gut passed seeds than for controls. For four of five species, germination latency was significantly faster for gut passed seeds than for controls. Feces had either no effect on seed germination rate or precluded germination. Data presented here support the hypothesis that white-faced capuchins are effective primary dispersers. Am J Phys Anthropol 138:486-492, 2009. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据