4.3 Article

Brief Communication: Paleohistopathological Analysis of Pathology Museum Specimens: Can Periosteal Reaction Microstructure Explain Lesion Etiology?

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY
卷 140, 期 1, 页码 186-193

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.21081

关键词

periostitis; histology; SEM-BSE; paleopathology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The assertion that the microstructure of periosteal new bone formation can be used to differentiate between disease etiologies (Schultz: Yrbk Phys Anthropol 44 [2001] 106-147; Schultz: Identification of pathological conditions in human skeletal remains, 2nd ed. London: Academic Press [2003] 73-109) was tested in a pilot-study, using diagnosed bone specimens from St George's Hospital Pathology Museum, London, UK. Embedded bone specimens exhibiting pathological periosteal new bone formation were examined using scanning electron microscopy in back-scattered electron imaging mode (SEM-BSE). The results suggest that several histological features (i.e. Grenzstreifen, Polsters, and sinuous lacunae) deemed to be diagnostic of specific pathological conditions are of no specific diagnostic value, as they are encountered in pathological conditions of differing disease etiology. These results tie in with a previous investigation demonstrating a lack of diagnostic qualitative or quantitative characteristics seen in the macroscopic and radiographic appearance of periosteal reactions (Weston: Am J Phys Anthropol 137 [2008] 48-59). Am J Phys Anthropol 140:186-193, 2009. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据