4.2 Article

Small for Gestational Age and Higher Birth Weight Predict Childhood Obesity in Preterm Infants

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY
卷 27, 期 9, 页码 721-730

出版社

THIEME MEDICAL PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1253555

关键词

Childhood obesity; premature birth; infant SGA; birth weight; exercise; prenatal drug exposure

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health
  2. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
  3. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
  4. Administration on Children, Youth, and Families
  5. Center for Substance Abuse and Treatment
  6. NIDA
  7. NICHD
  8. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We sought to determine the association between small for gestational age (SGA), birth weight, and childhood obesity within preterm polysubstance exposed children. We sampled 312 preterm children with 11-year body mass index (BMI; age- and sex-specific) data from the Maternal Lifestyle Study (51% girls, 21.5% SGA, 46% prenatal cocaine, and 55% tobacco exposed). Multinomial regression analyzed the association between 11-year obesity (OBE) and overweight (OW) and SGA, birth weight, first-year growth velocity, diet, and physical activity variables. Overall, 24% were OBE (BMI for age >= 95th percentile) and 16.7% were OW (BMI >= 85th and <95th percentiles). In adjusted analyses, SGA was associated with OW (odds ratio [OR] = 3.4, confidence interval [CI] 1.5 to 7.5). Higher birth weight was associated with OBE (OR 1.8, CI 1.3 to 2.4) and OW (OR 1.4, CI 1.1 to 2.0). Growth velocity was associated with OBE (OR = 2.7, CI 1.8 to 4.0) and OW(OR = 1.6, CI 1.1 to 2.4). Low exercise was associated with OBE (OR = 2.1, CI 1.0 to 4.4) and OW (OR = 2.1, CI 1.0 to 4.5). There was no effect of substance exposure on obesity outcomes. Many (41%) of these high-risk preterm 11-year-olds were obese/overweight. Multiple growth-related processes may be involved in obesity risk for preterm children, including fetal programming as indicated by the SGA effect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据