4.6 Article

Improved Vascular Survival and Growth in the Mouse Model of Hindlimb Ischemia by a Remote Signaling Mechanism

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 184, 期 3, 页码 686-696

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.11.032

关键词

-

资金

  1. NEEI grant [5R01EY019721]
  2. American Heart Association Scientist Development grant [11SD07580014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Deficiencies in prolyl hydroxylase domain proteins (PHDs) may lead to the accumulation of hypoxia-inducible factor-a proteins, the latter of which activate local angiogenic responses by paracrine mechanisms. Here, we investigate whether a keratinocyte-specific PHD deficiency may promote vascular survival and growth in a distantly located ischemic tissue by a remote signaling mechanism. We generated mice that carry a keratinocyte-specific Phd2 knockout (kPhd2K0) and performed femoral artery ligation. Relative to wild-type controls, kPhd2K0 mice displayed improved vascular survival and arteriogenesis in ischemic hind limbs, leading to the accelerated recovery of hincilimb perfusion and superior muscle regeneration. Similar protective effects were also seen in type land type 2 diabetic mice. Molecularly, both abundance of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha protein and expression of vascular endothelial growth factor-A were increased in epidermal tissues of kPhd2K0 mice, accompanied by increased plasma concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor-A. Contrary to kPhd2K0 mice, which are PHD2 deficient in all skin tissues, localized kPhd2K0 in hindlimb skin tissues did not have similar effects, excluding paracrine signaling as a major mechanism. Confirming the existence of remote effects, hepatocyte-specific Phd2 knockout also protected hind limbs from ischemia injury. These data indicate that vascular survival and growth in ischemia-injured tissue may be stimulated by suppressing PHD2 in a remotely located tissue and may provide highly effective angiogenesis therapies without the need for directly accessing target tissues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据