4.6 Article

Cell Growth in Aggregates Determines Gene Expression, Proliferation, Survival, Chemoresistance, and Sensitivity to Immune Effectors in Follicular Lymphoma

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 184, 期 1, 页码 282-295

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.09.018

关键词

-

资金

  1. Institut National de in Sante et de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM)
  2. Universite Paul Sabatier
  3. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  4. Institut National du Cancer (RITUXOP)
  5. Institut Carnot-Lymphome (CALYM)
  6. Fondation de France [2009002593]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lymphomas grow as dense aggregates in patients, but whether this spatial organization affects Lymphoma cell biology is unknown. We grew follicular lymphoma (FL) cells in vitro as multicellular aggregates of lymphoma cells to investigate this question. Gene expression analysis revealed that 612 genes were differentially expressed when cells grew in multicellular aggregates of lymphoma cells rather than in suspension. These genes correspond to several GO biological processes, such as hypoxia, activation of NF-kappa B pathway, and negative regulation of cell cycle, a gene signature also found in the transcriptomes from FL biopsies. Pimonidazole staining, HIF-1A accumulation, and VEGFA release confirmed that cells in multicellular aggregates of lymphoma cells actually respond to hypoxia. In adaptation to such conditions, they also displayed an activated NF-kappa B pathway and a quiescent status far more frequently than in suspension. When cultured in three dimensions, FL cells display resistance to doxorubicin and bendamustine, two drugs largely used in FL therapy, compared to FL cultured in suspension. Finally, multicellular aggregates of lymphoma cells were also found to be less sensitive to purified natural killer cells. To conclude, our study shows that in FL, spatial organization results in dramatic changes in FL biology, including gene expression, proliferation, drug resistance, and immune escape.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据